Original file (WebM audio/video file, VP9/Opus, length 2 h 11 min 12 s, 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, 697 kbps overall, file size: 654 MB)
This file is from Wikimedia Commons and may be used by other projects.
The description on its file description page there is shown below.
Summary
DescriptionNU- "Women Writers in Review" and developing a Wikidata model depicting Cultures of Reception.webm
English: In my role as Wikipedia Visiting Scholar at Northeastern University Library's Digital Scholarship Group, I focus on writing Wikipedia biographies about pre-20th-century women writers and articles about their works, broadly construed. This is supported by scholars in the Women Writers Project as well as reference librarians. As a remote community member of the team, I have access to library resources to support my efforts. A secondary focus area is championing the Cultures of Reception of pre-20th-century works by women writers associated with the university's "Women Writers in Review" initiative, which supports research into the transatlantic reception and readership of early texts by women. Reception history rubrics exist, and using structured data to understand Cultures of Reception allows for analysis, identification, and depiction of gender bias. But Wikidata lacks a model for it, and it's unclear how easy it would be to transform the API into Wikidata. The session will discuss approaches to this Case Study, and the value of creating a model in Wikidata so that other academics can contribute their unique data sets, and researchers can study the findings.
Session page: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2019:Diversity/Northeastern_University%27s_%22Women_Writers_in_Review%22_and_the_case_for_devloping_a_Wikidata_model_depicting_Cultures_of_Reception
to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0CC BY 3.0 Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 truetrue
The bot only checks for the license, human review is still required to check if the video is a derivative work, has freedom of panorama related issues and other copyright problems that might be present in the video. Visit licensing for more information. If you are a license reviewer, you can review this file by manually appending |reviewer={{subst:REVISIONUSER}} to this template.
Captions
Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents